Emotional judgments of scenes are influenced by unintentional averaging
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.
The Underconfidence with Practice (UPW) effect (Koriat, Sheffer & Ma'ayan, 2002), found in multi-trial learning, is marked by a pattern of underconfidence accompanied by an increase in resolution between the judgments and test on and after the second trial. We tested whether the memory for past test (MPT) heuristic (Finn & Metcalfe, 2007) could explain the resolution and calibration effects. To...
متن کاملEarly visual ERPs are influenced by individual emotional skills.
Processing information from faces is crucial to understanding others and to adapting to social life. Many studies have investigated responses to facial emotions to provide a better understanding of the processes and the neural networks involved. Moreover, several studies have revealed abnormalities of emotional face processing and their neural correlates in affective disorders. The aim of this ...
متن کاملSocial Judgments Are Influenced by Both Facial Expression and Direction of Eye Gaze
In the current study we examined how emotional expressions infl uence two social judgments, approachability and trustworthiness, and how the effect of emotional expression is modulated by the direction of the signaller’s eye gaze. For both social judgments, happy faces were judged more positively than all other emotions, while neutral faces were judged more favorably than faces displaying negat...
متن کاملJudgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
When people try to learn new information (e.g., in a school setting), they often have multiple opportunities to study the material. One of the most important things to know is whether people adjust their study behavior on the basis of past success so as to increase their overall level of learning (for example, by emphasizing information they have not yet learned). Monitoring their learning is a...
متن کاملMorality judgments: tests of an averaging model.
Pairs of items describing objectionable behaviors were rated for their overall morality. Contrary to additive or constant-weight averaging models, the ratings were demonstrated to depend upon the range as well as the average scale value of the component behaviors. A range model accounted for more than half of the variance left unexplained by the additive models. One interpretation of the range ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-00228-3